Archive for the ‘Fall for the Book’ Category

h1

Festival News Across Two States

June 24, 2009

As part of my various jobs, I keep tabs on two literary festivals in the Carolinas and Virginia — and both have breaking news.

Jill McCorkle

Jill McCorkle

The North Carolina Literary Festival has just announced a terrific addition to its line-up. Authors Lee Smith and Jill McCorkle will join musicians Matraca Berg and Marshall Chapman for an evening celebrating the highly acclaimed musical Good Ol’ Girls, which debuted as a work-in-progress at the first NCLF in 1998 and recently made its television premiere on UNC-TV. Smith and McCorkle will read and discuss selections from their fiction, works which first inspired the show, and Berg and Chapman will perform songs from the musical itself. The September 12 event, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, will be sponsored by Metro Magazine, under whose aegis I write this blog. For more information on the event and on the entire festival, September 10-13, check out the NCLF website here

Rae Armantrout

Rae Armantrout

Up in Virginia, Fall for the Book has announced a large slate of poets who will be appearing over the week-long festival, September 21-26 at George Mason University and at locations throughout Northern Virginia, D.C., and Maryland. Headlining the list are two seminal “language poets,” Rae Armantrout and Ron Silliman (the latter also the author of a tremendously successful blog on contemporary poetry), and nearly a dozen more poets are included so far — among them one of my own new favorites, Charles Jensen, a fascinating wordsmith and fine blogger in addition to his work directing The Writer’s Center in Bethesda, MD. For more information on Fall for the Book, check out that festival’s website here.

post to facebook

h1

A Long Week… A List of Links….

April 24, 2009

I’m sorry I’ve been such a slacker this week — well, here at least. It’s because it’s been such a busy week in other areas (end-of-semester crunch) that I’ve been AWOL on the blog.

Until I can get back on track, here are a quick few links worth checking out.

A nice interview with David A. Taylor, who’d also been interviewed here on my site.

Interviews with Laura Lippman: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3.

And a great letter from James Ellroy about his highly anticipated new book Blood’s A Rover — and hey, terrific news for Ellroy’s fans in the D.C. area, he’s tentatively signed up for the next Fall for the Book! (I’ll update on that as soon as it’s official….)

And finally, look for my review of Peter Schechter’s Pipeline in tomorrow’s Washington Post (Saturday, April 25).

Add to Facebook: post to facebook

h1

Fall for the Book Announces 2009 Award Winners (And Catches An Honor of Sorts Itself)

April 9, 2009
E.L. Doctorow

E.L. Doctorow

The Fall for the Book Festival — based at George Mason University and taking place Sept. 21-26 throughout Northern Virginia, D.C. and Maryland — has just announced the recipients of the two major award it gives out each year.

Novelist E.L. Doctorow captures the top honor in 2009: the Fairfax Prize for Lifetime Achievement in the Literary Arts. His last novel, The March, won both the National Book Critics Circle Award and the PEN/Faulkner Award, and his new novel, Homer & Langley, will be published on the eve of the festival. He’ll read from that and accept the prize on Thursday evening, September 24, at Mason’s Fairfax, VA, campus.

Earlier in the week, Fall for the Book presents the Mason Award to novelist, poet, and filmmaker Sherman Alexie. The award honors a writer whose work has helped to bring great literature to a wide reading public. Alexie accepts his award on Tuesday evening, September 22, at Mason’s Fairfax campus.

And Fall for the Book has recently earned mention in the staff picks section of Washington City Paper’s annual Best of D.C. issue. The festival ranked number 2 as best book festival (behind the behemoth that is the National Book Festival), but Mark Athitakis devoted most of the write-up to Fall for the Book’s accomplishments and initiatives. (Watch out, first place; here we come!)

Add to Facebook: post to facebook

h1

Jack Gilbert Then and Here and Here and Later

March 2, 2009

A few years back, when I was more involved on the programming side of the Fall for the Book Festival, I helped to bring poet Jack Gilbert to speak at George Mason University — certainly one of my most memorable evenings at the festival.

nbcagilbertHow I came about bringing Gilbert to Mason is a story in itself. In March 2005, I attended a poetry reading at the Folger Theatre in D.C. — one that was sponsored by the Poetry Society of America and that featured Gilbert, Maxine Kumin, Gary Snyder, and Irving Feldman. As anyone knows who has seen Gilbert read recently, he seems frail at the podium, he sometimes struggles with reading his own work, he’ll stop mid-poem and start over from the beginning to try to keep his way. And yet, throughout it all, he’s completely mesmerizing. A hush falls over the audience, as a group not just respectful but almost reverent, careful not to miss a word. After the reading at the Folger, four lines were set up, one for each author, and while the three other poets — masters of the form — chatted with a few fans, the line for Gilbert’s signing stretched long throughout the crowd. The copies of his latest collection at that time, Refusing Heaven, got snatched up quickly, and I missed the opportunity to buy a copy of the book by this poet whom I’ve never read or even heard of but who’d quickly left me in awe.

Turns out, however, that I had indeed read his work, just recently in fact. I just didn’t know it was his.

While the crowds waited, I ended up chatting at length with one of the women hosting the event — another person I didn’t know but should have: Alice Quinn, then poetry editor of The New Yorker. (We ended up in such a long discussion that afterwards several people assumed we were old friends — several poets, I should add, who would surely have made better use than I did of 10 minutes with The New Yorker. Really, I don’t know how I stumble into things.) Quinn, long a champion of Gilbert’s I would learn, clued me in about his career, his importance as a poet, and the fact that she’d recently published some of the poems from the new collection, including a short one that I’d read the previous fall and that had hung with me long after I’d put aside that issue. ”That was him?” I asked. “Oh, I really liked that one” — revealing some core ignorance, I’m sure, with each word from my lips.  

I started to reprint that poem here, but then found an audio clip of Gilbert reading it. Please do check out “By Small and Small: Midnight to 4 a.m.” 

A few weeks later, during a planning session for Fall for the Book, we were talking about poets and I explained how enamored I’d become of Gilbert and, with the go-ahead from our director, Bill Miller, I emailed my new friend, the poetry editor of The New Yorker, and got the contact information for one of the greatest poets working today (one I’d only recently even heard of) and asked him if he’d like to come to Fairfax and read a little from his new book. 

Sometimes, stumbling blindly works, it seems.

Interestingly, when the festival itself arrived, we were all as unprepared and unaware as I had been. We’d assigned Gilbert to a small meeting room, but the number of people who showed up for his reading would have overflowed the space about four times over. We relocated him quickly to a large ballroom, and needless to say, he commanded the venue quite well: charming, witty, challenging, and unforgettable.

coverRecently, new works by Gilbert have been showing up in various spots. The latest issue of The New Yorker features the poem “Waiting and Finding.” In late February, Granta published two of Gilbert’s poems — “Meanwhile” and “The New Bride Almost Visible In Latin” — to kick off a new series focussed on contemporary American poets. And next month brings the publication of a new collection, The Dance Most of All. Add that one to your Amazon cart now.

Add to Facebook: post to facebook

h1

Fall for the Book Forum Poses Provocative Questions

February 18, 2009
"Woman With Book," Pablo Picasso

"Woman With Book," Pablo Picasso

The Fall for the Book Festival has been using the “off season” not only to begin planning for this fall’s festival, but also to crank up some interesting initiatives. One of these is the new Fall for the Book Forum, which is striving to build an online community of readers and writers talking about some topics central to our shared love of literature. Each week, the website is posting a new question on the left-hand side of its homepage; now all that’s needed is some more readers to get in on the discussion.  

This week’s question is a quietly provocative one, stemming from this 2007 NPR story about women reading more than men. Fall for the Book asks:

In late 2007, National Public Radio posted a story revealing that women read far more than men (9 vs. 5 books/year). The statistics gathered from the 2008 Fall for the Book festival show the same trend in those who attended book-related events. Clearly, reading is not inherently a female thing. Why, then, are these statistics showing what they are?

I encourage folks to visit the Fall for the Book site and sign-up to join the discussion. I myself am going to post the following there in just a few minutes as a way to help get the ball rollling.

The NPR story starts with novelist Ian McEwan conducting an informal study that revealed a greater interest in reading by women than by men. Several years ago, Mario Vargas Llosa made a similar observation at the start of his essay “Why Literature?” (first published in The New Republic and reprinted in various spots on the web). The first (longish) section of that essay is below:

It has often happened to me, at book fairs or in bookstores, that a gentleman approaches me and asks me for a signature. “It is for my wife, my young daughter, or my mother,” he explains. “She is a great reader and loves literature.” Immediately I ask: “And what about you? Don’t you like to read?” The answer is almost always the same: “Of course I like to read, but I am a very busy person.” I have heard this explanation dozens of times: this man and many thousands of men like him have so many important things to do, so many obligations, so many responsibilities in life, that they cannot waste their precious time buried in a novel, a book of poetry, or a literary essay for hours and hours. According to this widespread conception, literature is a dispensable activity, no doubt lofty and useful for cultivating sensitivity and good manners, but essentially an entertainment, an adornment that only people with time for recreation can afford. It is something to fit in between sports, the movies, a game of bridge or chess; and it can be sacrificed without scruple when one “prioritizes” the tasks and the duties that are indispensable in the struggle of life.

It seems clear that literature has become more and more a female activity. In bookstores, at conferences or public readings by writers, and even in university departments dedicated to the humanities, the women clearly outnumber the men. The explanation traditionally given is that middle-class women read more because they work fewer hours than men, and so many of them feel that they can justify more easily than men the time that they devote to fantasy and illusion. I am somewhat allergic to explanations that divide men and women into frozen categories and attribute to each sex its characteristic virtues and shortcomings; but there is no doubt that there are fewer and fewer readers of literature, and that among the saving remnant of readers women predominate.

This is the case almost everywhere. In Spain, for example, a recent survey organized by the General Society of Spanish Writers revealed that half of that country’s population has never read a book. The survey also revealed that in the minority that does read, the number of women who admitted to reading surpasses the number of men by 6.2 percent, a difference that appears to be increasing. I am happy for these women, but I feel sorry for these men, and for the millions of human beings who could read but have decided not to read.

They earn my pity not only because they are unaware of the pleasure that they are missing, but also because I am convinced that a society without literature, or a society in which literature has been relegated — like some hidden vice — to the margins of social and personal life, and transformed into something like a sectarian cult, is a society condemned to become spiritually barbaric, and even to jeopardize its freedom. I wish to offer a few arguments against the idea of literature as a luxury pastime, and in favor of viewing it as one of the most primary and necessary undertakings of the mind, an irreplaceable activity for the formation of citizens in a modern and democratic society, a society of free individuals….

Add to Facebook: 

post to facebook

  • Twitter

  • Twitter Updates

  • GoodReads

    Inherent Vice


    Art Taylor's favorite books »
    Share book reviews and ratings with Art, and even join a book club on Goodreads.
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Reviews

  • Categories

  • Archives